Home
Search Go
Print  /   Email
NYFA QUARTERLY ARCHIVE
> ARTICLE 1: Slam! Bouncing words off the walls
> ARTICLE 2: Report from the Poetry Wars: Slam’s Tenth Anniversary, A NYC Perspective
> ARTICLE 3: The Culture of Slam: Creating Community
> ASK ARTEMISIA: Dr. Art on Developing Your Artist Portfolio
> DCA PAGES: NYC Department of Cultural Affairs
NYFA QUARTERLY - Summer 1999
Summer 1999, Vol. 15, No. 2
Slam! Bouncing Words off the Walls: A Feature on Poetry Slams


Article 2

Report from the Poetry Wars: Slam’s Tenth Anniversary, A NYC Perspective

Bob Holman

On August 11-14, 1999, slam returns to Chicago, its birthplace, for the biggest slam of them all, the Tenth Anniversary Edition of the National Poetry Slam. There will be 48 teams, 200 poets participating in day and night events for four days.

The recent IMHO (In My Humble Opinion) triumph of the People’s Poetry Gathering, a three-day, 10,000 people, 200 poet, 100 event festival that sprawled across Lower Manhattan, which Stanley Kunitz labeled "a populist bacchanal," makes this a good time to check slam’s continuing embroiled embrace in the poetry world, and how slam itself has changed in New York since I brought it to the Nuyorican Poets Cafe ten years ago.

Slam has been the most active grass-roots arts movement in the country for the last decade, and has had a crucial impact in democratizing poetry, and art in general, by pointing to the participatory aspects of performance for both artist and audience.

The Beta Bete of the poetry world, slam was invented, as the hagiographical resources echo, by ex-construction worker Marc (So What??!!) Smith, when he and an intrepid band of poetry performers needed something to fill in the last 15 minutes of a poetry show they were running at the Get Me High in Chi-town, 1986. Hey, uttered Smith as the story goes, why not a poetry competition with judges scoring each poem and we call it slam? The slam took off. Literally too, soon moving to the fabulous Green Mill Tavern, where Marc continues the Sundays at 7 events to this day.

The Top 10 things that blew my mind about slam ten years ago and which continue to do so today:

    10. Changing the sillyputty poet-audience relationship into a critical one, with the poem as the medium of exchange.

    9. Judges who don’t have to pass a test to qualify to judge. Instead, they are selected whimsically and score according to what they like. Point being: we are all judges.

    8. You cannot rate a poem. So it happens every slam.

    7. Audience interactivity is encouraged. The audience is part of the show. Heckles are poems. Democratizing.

    6. The accessibility that slam audiences demand from the poets they listen to. They don't insist that they understand the poem at first hearing, but they seem to feel they have every right to punish poets for being deliberately abstruse.

    5. Poets are pushed to give it up, gladiatorially. After years of readings being a means to introduce the audience to text or celebrating a book’s publication, in slam, performance is emphasized as a means of poem transmission that is the equivalent of text.

    4. The whole hoopla caboodle is a parody of that which poetry opposes, yet when done masterfully, works both ways always.

    3. That it’s called a Poetry say-the-word "slam" say-the-word. The Roller Derby of poetry.

    2. That it attracts crowds for poetry, not necessarily particular poets, but poets reap the rewards. That it moves, fast. That it entertains, deep (well, on occasion. I mean, it should).

    1. That for each of these reasons, there is just as valid a reason for NOT.

I have come to change my mind about the 3-minute rule (at Nationals, there are penalties assessed after 3:09! I was the lone holdout for no penalties at the Slammasters Meeting in 1996), knowing it helps the show flow. I still believe props/costumes/music are valid accouterments of poetry performance, and that by outlawing them the slam community sets itself up for controversy over minutiae rather than, say, organizing to change the world.

Marc Smith’s contention that slam is a community-builder has proven to be correct. The slam experiment in community will someday be seen as the closest thing we have to a 90s version of Black Mountain. But it’s just as true that slam is a marketing ploy: an emergent form in this Triumph of Capitalism means being able to find a way through the billboard blitz to the tender public. Slam is a way to ease an anti-poetic era into an ear of plenty, enabling you to go to a poetry reading without having to admit you’re going to a poetry reading. Slam! "Every slam a finality." -- Bob Kaufman

And right here in town (when the town is New York City), poetry slams have had quite a history. The New York slam team has held the National Slam title for the last two years. I ran the slam at the Nuyorican Poets Cafe for seven years, 1989-1997; Keith Roach has been there since, with Dot Antoniades hosting the Slam Open on Wednesdays, and Steve Colman of last year’s National Champion Nuyorican New York team coaching the slam team.

Two other slams are now held regularly in New York. The Urbana slam, led by Patrick Anderson, Cristin O’Keefe Aptowicz, Amanda Nazario and Beau Sia, is a continuation of the Chelsea Feast Slam, hosted by Keystone in 1998. The Chelsea Feast Slam was in turn a continuation of the West Bank Slam which provided NYC with its first National Slam crown two years ago in Team Mouth Almighty (I). Urbana is a great scene, very young, with Diva Slams, Goth Slams, and Prom Slams. All are very funny, very powerful.

"A little bit louder," at Bar 13, is hosted by Guy LeCharles Gonzalez along with Lynn Procope and Roger Bonair-Agard -- all three were on the National Championship Nuyorican team last year. There is a lot of crossover between 13 and Urbana, the sweet camaraderie one hopes for under slam’s ferocious competitive cover.

The Nuyorican, Urbana, and 13 will all field teams at Chicago this summer. Will New York threepeat home the Boot, as the Slam trophy is affectionately known? Will internecine rivalries rock the National Drunken Boat?

But the biggest news now in slam is: Youth! Intercollegiate! High Schools! The Bronx Writers Council just concluded a series of slams at Borders (the mind boggles at the ironic allies of the late 90s), which were hugely successful.

The teen volume has been amped by a fresh program called Youth Speaks, which began in San Francisco and is now in New York thanks to the super Teachers & Writers Collaborative. The National Teen Slam was held in Santa Fe from April 17-18, with eight teams from around the country competing, and the Youth Speaks Youth Slam at the Peoples Poetry Gathering was an extraordinary event.

The nation’s first Intercollegiate Slam was held at Sarah Lawrence College last fall, and on April 7, 1999, the first NYC Intercollegiate Slam was held before a screaming crowd at NYU. Columbia walked off with the trophy, besting NYU, Bard, Sarah Lawrence, and Fordham, in a great night of, for, and by poetry.

The Future! is the Future of Slam: by taking on the competitive model in this horrendous (burp) era of The Triumph of Capitalism Over Everything, poetry can demand parity with other competitive events, like football, say. I want my kids to have the opportunity to letter in poetry slam. And I want to hear those cheers, those public poems led by the poetry cheerleaders. And I want heckleleaders, too!

Bob Holman teaches Exploding Text: Poetry in Performance at Bard College. He hosts the Poetry Site at the Mining Co. (http://poetry.miningco.com), and is editing the world’s first digital poetry anthology, The World of Poetry, www.worldofpoetry.org with Todd Colby.